System and Method for Coordinating Multiple Radio Transceivers within the Same Device Platform

ABSTRACT

A wireless device having a central control entity that coordinates multiple radio transceivers co-located within the same device platform to mitigate coexistence interference. The wireless device comprises an LTE transceiver, a WiFi transceiver, a BT transceiver, or a GNSS receiver. In one embodiment, the central control entity receives radio signal information from the transceivers and determines control information. The control information is used to trigger FDM solution such that the transceivers operate in designated frequency channels to mitigate co-existence interference. In another embodiment, the central control entity receives traffic and scheduling information from the transceivers and determines control information. The control information is used to trigger TDM solution such that the transceivers are scheduled for transmitting or receiving radio signals over specific time duration to mitigate co-existence interference. In yet another embodiment, power control solution is used to mitigate coexistence interference.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation, and claims priority under claimspriority under 35 U.S.C. §120 from nonprovisional U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/134,876, entitled “System and Method forCoordinating Multiple Radio Transceivers Within the Same DevicePlatform,” filed on Jun. 20, 2011, the subject matter of which isincorporated herein by reference. Application Ser. No. 13/134,876, inturn, claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 61/356,088, entitled “Method to Mitigate theInterference between LTE and other Communication System Co-located onthe Same Device Platform,” filed on Jun. 18, 2010; U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 61/373,142, entitled “Method to Trigger In-DeviceCoexistence Interference Mitigation in Mobile Cellular Systems,” filedon Aug. 12, 2010, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein byreference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosed embodiments relate generally to wireless networkcommunications, and, more particularly, to Multi-Radio Terminals (MRT)containing Long Term Evolution (LTE) transceiver, WiFi transceiver, BTtransceiver, or GNSS receiver.

BACKGROUND

Ubiquitous network access has been almost realized today. From networkinfrastructure point of view, different networks belong to differentlayers (e.g., distribution layer, cellular layer, hot spot layer,personal network layer, and fixed/wired layer) that provide differentlevels of coverage and connectivity to users. Because the coverage of aspecific network may not be available everywhere, and because differentnetworks may be optimized for different services, it is thus desirablethat user devices support multiple radio access networks on the samedevice platform. As the demand for wireless communication continues toincrease, wireless communication devices such as cellular telephones,personal digital assistants (PDAs), smart handheld devices, laptopcomputers, tablet computers, etc., are increasingly being equipped withmultiple radio transceivers. A multiple radio terminal (MRT) maysimultaneously include a Long-Term Evolution (LTE) or LTE-Advanced(LTE-A) radio, a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN, e.g., WiFi) accessradio, a Bluetooth (BT) radio, and a Global Navigation Satellite System(GNSS) radio.

Due to scarce radio spectrum resource, different technologies mayoperate in overlapping or adjacent radio spectrums. For example,LTE/LTE-A TDD mode often operates at 2.3-2.4 GHz, WiFi often operates at2.400-2.483.5 GHz, and BT often operates at 2.402-2.480 GHz.Simultaneous operation of multiple radios co-located on the samephysical device, therefore, can suffer significant degradation includingsignificant coexistence interference between them because of theoverlapping or adjacent radio spectrums. Due to physical proximity andradio power leakage, when the transmission of data for a first radiotransceiver overlaps with the reception of data for a second radiotransceiver in time domain, the second radio transceiver reception cansuffer due to interference from the first radio transceivertransmission. Likewise, data transmission of the second radiotransceiver can interfere with data reception of the first radiotransceiver.

FIG. 1 (Prior Art) is a diagram that illustrates interference between anLTE transceiver and a co-located WiFi/BT transceiver and GNSS receiver.In the example of FIG. 1, user equipment (UE) 10 is an MRT comprising anLTE transceiver 11, a GNSS receiver 12, and a BT/WiFi transceiver 13co-located on the same device platform. LTE transceiver 11 comprises anLTE baseband module and an LTE RF module coupled to an antenna #1. GNSSreceiver 12 comprises a GNSS baseband module and a GNSS RF modulecoupled to antenna #2. BT/WiFi transceiver 13 comprises a BT/WiFibaseband module and a BT/WiFi RF module coupled to antenna #3. When LTEtransceiver 11 transmits radio signals, both GNSS receiver 12 andBT/WiFi transceiver 13 may suffer coexistence interference from LTE.Similarly, when BT/WiFi transceiver 13 transmits radio signals, bothGNSS receiver 12 and LTE transceiver 11 may suffer coexistenceinterference from BT/WiFi. How UE10 can simultaneously communicate withmultiple networks through different transceivers and avoid/reducecoexistence interference is a challenging problem.

FIG. 2 (Prior Art) is a diagram that illustrates the signal power ofradio signals from two co-located RF transceivers. In the example ofFIG. 2, transceiver A and transceiver B are co-located in the samedevice platform (i.e., in-device). The transmit (TX) signal bytransceiver A (e.g., WiFi TX in ISM CH1) is very close to the receive(RX) signal (e.g., LTE RX in Band 40) for transceiver B in frequencydomain. The out of band (OOB) emission and spurious emission bytransceiver A may be unacceptable to transceiver B resulted by imperfectTX filter and RF design. For example, the TX signal power level bytransceiver A may be still higher (e.g. 60 dB higher before filtering)than RX signal power level for transceiver B even after the filtering(e.g., after 50 dB suppression).

In addition to imperfect TX filter and RF design, imperfect RX filterand RF design may also cause unacceptable in-device coexistenceinterference. For example, some RF components may be saturated due totransmit power from another in-device transceiver but cannot becompletely filtered out, which results in low noise amplifier (LNA)saturation and cause analog to digital converter (ADC) to workincorrectly. Such problem actually exists regardless of how much thefrequency separation between the TX channel and the RX channel is. Thisis because certain level of TX power (e.g., from a harmonic TX signal)may be coupled into the RX RF frontend and saturate its LNA. Variousin-device coexistence interference mitigation solutions are sought.

SUMMARY

A wireless device having a central control entity that coordinatesmultiple radio transceivers co-located within the same device platformto mitigate coexistence interference. The wireless device comprises thecentral control entity, an LTE transceiver, a WiFi/BT transceiver, and aGNSS receiver.

In one embodiment, the central control entity receives radio signalinformation from the transceivers and determines control information.The control information is used to trigger Frequency DivisionMultiplexing (FDM) solution such that the transmitted/received signalsmoves to designated frequency channels to mitigate co-existenceinterference. The signal information comprises coexistence interferencemeasurement information, received signal quality information,transmission status, an LTE serving frequency information, a WiFifrequency channel information, a BT frequency-hopping range information,and a center frequency information of GNSS signal. The controlinformation for FDM solution comprises an instruction to trigger the LTEtransceiver to indicate to an LTE base station which frequency channelsare affected by coexistence interference, an instruction to trigger theLTE transceiver to send indication to an LTE base station for switching(e.g., handover, RLF) from a first RF carrier to a second RF carrier, aninstruction or recommendation to switch to or use a new WiFi channel forthe WiFi transceiver, and an instruction to adjust frequency hoppingrange for the BT transceiver.

In another embodiment, the central control entity receives traffic andscheduling information from the transceivers and determines controlinformation. The control information is used to trigger Time DivisionMultiplexing (TDM) solution such that the transceivers are scheduled fortransmitting or receiving radio signals over specific time duration tomitigate co-existence interference. The traffic and schedulinginformation comprises transmission status, operation mode, priorityrequest, received signal quality or strength, traffic patterninformation, WiFi Beacon reception time information, LTE DRXconfiguration, BT master/slave, and GNSS receiver type. The controlinformation for TDM solution comprises an instruction to trigger the LTEtransceiver to send recommendation of ON/OFF duration, ON/OFF ratio,starting time, or duty cycle for DRX configuration to an LTE basestation, an instruction to terminate or resume the LTE/WiFi/BTtransceiver TX or RX over specific time duration, an instruction to WiFitransceiver to control the transmission/reception time by negotiatingwith WiFi access point (AP) by using power saving protocol.

In yet another embodiment, power control solution is used to mitigatecoexistence interference. For LTE power control, the central controlentity determines a maximum power restriction level for the LTEtransceiver based on the received signal quality for the WiFi/BT/GNSSreceiver. The maximum power restriction level is recommended by the LTEtransceiver to an LTE base station. For WiFi/BT power control, thecentral control entity instructs the WiFi/BT transceiver to adjusttransmit power level if the received signal quality for LTE signal ispoor.

Other embodiments and advantages are described in the detaileddescription below. This summary does not purport to define theinvention. The invention is defined by the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, where like numerals indicate like components,illustrate embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 1 (Prior Art) is a diagram that illustrates interference between anLTE transceiver and a co-located WiFi/BT transceiver and GNSS receiver.

FIG. 2 (Prior Art) is a diagram that illustrates the signal power ofradio signals from two co-located RF transceivers in a same deviceplatform.

FIG. 3 illustrates a user equipment having multiple radio transceiversin a wireless communication system in accordance with one novel aspect.

FIG. 4 illustrates a first embodiment of a simplified block diagram ofan LTE user equipment having a central control entity.

FIG. 5 illustrates a second embodiment of a simplified block diagram ofan LTE user equipment having a central control entity.

FIG. 6 illustrates a global spectrum allocation around 2.4 GHz ISM bandin more detail.

FIG. 7 illustrates a first example of a FDM solution for 3GPP in-devicecoexistence interference avoidance.

FIG. 8 illustrates a second example of a FDM solution for 3GPP in-devicecoexistence interference avoidance.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a TDM solution for 3GPP in-devicecoexistence interference avoidance.

FIG. 10 illustrates a first example of a power control solution for 3GPPin-device coexistence interference avoidance.

FIG. 11 illustrates a second example of a power control solution for3GPP in-device coexistence interference avoidance.

FIG. 12 illustrates a detailed procedure of in-device coexistenceinterference avoidance using a central control entity in accordance withone novel aspect.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart of a method of coexistence interferenceavoidance using FDM solution.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart of a method of coexistence interferenceavoidance using TDM solution.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to some embodiments of theinvention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanyingdrawings.

FIG. 3 illustrates a user equipment UE 31 having multiple radiotransceivers in a wireless communication system 30 in accordance withone novel aspect. Wireless communication system 30 comprises a userequipment UE31, a serving base station (e.g., evolved node-B) eNB32, aWiFi access point WiFi AP33, a Bluetooth device BT34, and a globalpositioning system satellite device GPS35. Wireless communication system30 provides various network access services for UE31 via different radioaccess technologies. For example, eNB32 provides cellular radio network(e.g., a 3GPP Long-Term Evolution (LTE) or LTE-Advanced (LTE-A) system)access, WiFi AP33 provides local coverage in Wireless Local Area Network(WLAN) access, BT34 provides short-range personal network communication,and GPS35 provides global access as part of a Global NavigationSatellite System (GNSS). To better facilitate the various radio accesstechnologies, UE31 is a multi-radio terminal (MRT) that is equipped withmultiple radios co-located in the same device platform (i.e.,in-device).

Due to scarce radio spectrum resource, different radio accesstechnologies may operate in overlapping or adjacent radio spectrums. Asillustrated in FIG. 3, UE31 communicates radio signal 36 with eNB32,radio signal 37 with WiFi AP33, radio signal 38 with BT34, and receivesradio signal 39 from GPS35. Radio signal 36 belongs to 3GPP Band 40,radio signal 37 belongs to one of the WiFi channels, and radio signal 38belongs to one of the seventy-nine Bluetooth channels. The frequenciesof all those radio signals fall within a range from 2.3 GHz to 2.5 GHz,which may result in significant coexistence interference with eachother. In one novel aspect, UE31 comprises a central control entity thatcoordinates with different radio transceivers within the same deviceplatform to mitigate coexistence interference.

FIG. 4 illustrates a first embodiment of a simplified block diagram of awireless communication device 41 having a central control entity.Wireless communication device 41 comprises memory 42, a processor 43having a central control entity 44, a LTE/LTE-A transceiver 45, a GPSreceiver 46, a WiFi transceiver 47, a Bluetooth transceiver 48, and bus49. In the example of FIG. 4, central control entity 44 is a logicalentity physically implemented within processor 43, which is also usedfor device application processing for device 41. Central control entity44 is connected to various transceivers within device 41, andcommunicates with the various transceivers via bus 49. For example, WiFitransceiver 47 transmits WiFi signal information and/or WiFi traffic andscheduling information to central control entity 44 (e.g., depicted by athick dotted line 101). Based on the received WiFi information, centralcontrol entity 44 determines control information and transmits thecontrol information to LTE/LTE-A transceiver 45 (e.g., depicted by athick dotted line 102). In one embodiment, LTE transceiver 45 furthercommunicates with its serving base station eNB40 based on the receivedcontrol information to mitigate coexistence interference (e.g., depictedby a thick dotted line 103).

FIG. 5 illustrates a second embodiment of a simplified block diagram ofa wireless device 51 having a central control entity. Wirelesscommunication device 51 comprises memory 52, a processor 53, a LTE/LTE-Atransceiver 54 having a central control entity 55, a GPS receiver 56, aWiFi transceiver 57, a Bluetooth transceiver 58, and bus 59. Eachtransceiver contains a local control entity (e.g., the MAC processor), aradio frequency (RF) module, and a baseband (BB) module. In the exampleof FIG. 5, central control entity 55 is logical entity physicallyimplemented within a processor that is physically located withinLTE/LTE-A transceiver 54. Alternatively, central control entity 55 mayphysically be located within the WiFi transceiver or within theBluetooth transceiver. Central control entity 55 is coupled to variousradio transceivers co-located within device 41 and communicates with thevarious local control entities via bus 49. For example, the WiFi controlentity inside WiFi transceiver 57 transmits WiFi information to centralcontrol entity 55 (e.g., depicted by a thick dotted line 104). Based onthe received WiFi information, central control entity 55 determinescontrol information and transmits the control information to the LTEcontrol entity inside LTE/LTE-A transceiver 54 (e.g., depicted by athick dotted line 105). In one embodiment, LTE/LTE-A transceiver 54further communicates with its serving base station based on the receivedcontrol information to mitigate coexistence interference (e.g., depictedby a thick dotted line 106).

How to effectively mitigate coexistence interference is a challengingproblem for co-located radio transceivers operating in overlapping oradjacent frequency channels. The problem is more severe around the 2.4GHz ISM (The Industrial, Scientific and Medical) radio frequency band.FIG. 6 illustrates a global spectrum allocation around the 2.4 GHz ISMband in more detail and the corresponding coexistence interferenceimpact from WiFi to LTE in 3GPP Band 40. As illustrated by the top table61 of FIG. 6, the 2.4 GHz ISM band (e.g., ranges from 2400-2483.5 MHz)is used by both fourteen WiFi channels and seventy-nine Bluetoothchannels. The WiFi channel usage depends on WiFi AP decision, whileBluetooth utilizes frequency hopping across the ISM band. In addition tothe crowded ISM band, 3GPP Band 40 ranges from 2300-2400 MHz, and Band 7UL ranges from 2500-2570 MHz, both are very close to the 2.4 GHz ISMradio frequency band.

The bottom table 62 of FIG. 6 illustrates the coexistence interferenceimpact from WiFi to LTE in 3GPP Band 40 under a typical attenuationfilter. Table 62 lists the desensitization value of an LTE transceiveroperating in a specific frequency channel (e.g., each row of Table 62)that is interfered by a co-located WiFi transceiver operating in anotherspecific frequency channel (e.g., each column of Table 62). Thedesensitization value in Table 62 indicates how much the LTE receivesignal sensitivity needs to be boosted in order to reach the same signalquality (e.g., SNR/SINR) as if there is no interference from theco-located WiFi transceiver. For example, if the LTE transceiveroperates at 2310 MHz and the WiFi transceiver operates at 2412 MHz, thenthe LTE receive signal needs to be boosted for 2.5 dB to offset anycoexistence interference. On the other hand, if the LTE transceiveroperates at 2390 MHz and the WiFi transceiver operates at 2412 MHz, thenthe LTE receive signal needs to be boosted for 66 dB to offset anycoexistence interference. Therefore, without additional interferenceavoidance mechanism, traditional filtering solution is insufficient tomitigate coexistence interference such that different radio accesstechnologies can work well independently on the same device platform.

Different solutions have been sought to avoid the coexistenceinterference. Among the different interference avoidance solutions,frequency division multiplexing (FDM), time division multiplexing (TDM),and power management are three main solutions proposed in accordancewith the present invention. Furthermore, a central control entity isutilized to coordinate co-located transceivers and to facilitate thevarious interference avoidance solutions. The detailed embodiments andexamples of the various interference avoidance solutions are nowdescribed below with accompanying drawings.

FIG. 7 illustrates a first example of a FDM solution for 3GPPcoexistence interference avoidance. In the example of FIG. 7, an LTEtransceiver is co-located with a WiFi/BT transceiver. The transmit (TX)signal by the WiFi/BT transceiver (e.g., WiFi/BT TX signal 71) is veryclose to the receive (RX) signal for the LTE transceiver (e.g., LTE RXsignal 72) in frequency domain. As a result, the out of band (GOB)emission and spurious emission by the WiFi/BT transceiver isunacceptable to the LTE transceiver resulted by imperfect TX filter andRF design. For example, the WiFi/BT TX signal power level may be stillhigher (e.g. 60 dB higher before filtering) than the LTE RX signal powerlevel even after the filtering (e.g., after 50 dB suppression) withoutadditional interference avoidance mechanism. As illustrated in FIG. 7,one possible FDM solution is to move the LTE RX signal 72 away from theISM band by using handover procedure.

In LTE systems, most activities including handover procedures arecontrolled by the network. Therefore, at the initiation of LTEnetwork-controlled UE-assisted FDM solutions, the UE can send anindication to the network to report the problem resulted by coexistenceinterference, or to recommend a certain action (e.g., handover) to beperformed. For example, when there is ongoing interference on theserving frequency, indication can be sent by the UE whenever it hasproblem in LTE downlink (DL) or ISM DL reception it cannot solve byitself, and the eNB has not taken action yet based on RRM measurements.The triggers of indication, based on pre-defined criteria or configuredby the eNB, could also be based on whether there is unacceptableinterference on the serving frequency, or whether there is eitherongoing or potential interference on other non-serving frequencies.

Device coordination capability is required to support the 3GPP FDMsolution. From LTE perspective, LTE transceiver first needs to know(e.g., via an internal controller) whether other in-devicetransceiver(s) is transmitting or receiving within limited time latency.More specifically, the LTE transceiver needs to know the time durationwhen the LTE transceiver can measure the coexistence interference due toWiFi/BT transmission, the time duration when LTE could receive withoutcoexistence interference from WiFi/BT transceivers. Based on thatknowledge, the LTE transceiver can measure coexistence interference andevaluate which frequencies may or may not be seriously interfered (e.g.,unusable frequencies) for LTE RX. The LTE transceiver will then indicatethe unusable frequencies to the eNB to trigger FDM. From WiFi/BT/GNSSperspective, LTE transceiver also needs to know whether the LTEtransmission in which frequencies would result in unacceptableperformance to other WiFi/BT/GNSS in-device receivers. Once the LTEtransceiver determines that significant coexistence interference wouldtrigger the FDM solution, the UE sends an indication to the eNB forrequesting handover from the current serving frequency to anotherfrequency that is farther away from the WiFi/BT/GNSS signal.

FIG. 8 illustrates a second example of a FDM solution for 3GPPcoexistence interference avoidance. Similar to FIG. 7, the out of band(OOB) emission and spurious emission by the WiFi/BT transceiver isunacceptable to the LTE transceiver resulted by imperfect TX filter andRF design. As illustrated in FIG. 8, the FDM solution is to move the ISMsignal (e.g., WiFi/BT TX signal 81) away from the LTE received signal(e.g., LTE RX signal 82). In one example, the WiFi transceiver mayreceive an instruction to switch to a new WiFi channel farther away fromthe LTE band, or a recommendation on which WiFi channel to be used. Inanother example, the Bluetooth transceiver may receive an instruction toadjust its frequency hopping range.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a TDM solution for 3GPP coexistenceinterference avoidance. The basic principle of the TDM solution is toreduce time overlap between the WiFi/BT TX and the LTE RX to avoidcoexistence interference. In a DRX based TDM solution, a UE recommendsDRX configuration parameters to its serving eNB. Similar to FDMsolution, device coordination capability is required to support 3GPP DRXbased TDM solution. For example, a control entity is used to derive therecommended DRX ON/OFF configuration to the eNB. The control entityreceives information from co-located WiFi/BT transceivers includingoperation type (e.g. WiFi AP, BT master), traffic states (e.g. Tx or Rx)and characteristics (e.g. level of activity, traffic pattern), andpriority demand, and determines the recommended DRX ON/OFF duration, DRXON/OFF ratio, duty cycle, and starting time.

In an HARQ reservation based TDM solution, a UE recommends bitmap orsome assistance information to help its eNB perform sub-frame levelscheduling control for interference avoidance. Various methods ofscheduling transmitting and receiving time slots for co-located radiotransceivers have been proposed. For example, a BT device (e.g., RF#1)first synchronizes its communication time slots with a co-locatedcellular radio module (e.g., RF#2), and then obtains the traffic pattern(e.g. BT eSCO) of the co-located cellular radio module. Based on thetraffic pattern, the BT device selectively skips one or more TX or RXtime slots to avoid data transmission or reception in certain time slotsand thereby reducing interference with the co-located cellular radiomodule. The skipped time slots are disabled for TX or RX operation toprevent interference and to achieve more energy saving. For additionaldetails on multi-radio coexistence, see: U.S. patent application Ser.No. 12/925,475, entitled “System and Methods for Enhancing Coexistenceefficiency for multi-radio terminals,” filed on Oct. 22, 2010, by Ko etal. (the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference).

In addition to DRX and HARQ based TDM solutions, UE autonomous denial isanother type of TDM solution for interference avoidance. In oneembodiment, the LTE transceiver stops UL TX to protect ISM or GNSS DLRX. This can only happen infrequently and for short-term events,otherwise the LTE connection performance will be impacted. In anotherembodiment, the WiFi or BT transceiver stops UL TX to protect LTE DL RX.This may be necessary to protect important LTE DL signal such as paging.The UE autonomous denial solution also requires device coordinationcapability (e.g., via an internal controller). The LTE transceiver needsto know the priority RX request from WiFi/BT/GNSS receiver and how longto terminate the LTE UL TX. The LTE transceiver also needs to be able toindicate its own RX priority request to the internal controller toterminate WiFi/BT UL TX. In addition, such knowledge needs to beindicated in real time manner or be indicated in a specific pattern.

FIG. 10 illustrates a first example of a power control solution for 3GPPcoexistence interference avoidance. As illustrated in FIG. 10, whenWiFi/BT TX signal 107 happens at a frequency channel close to LTE RXsignal 108, the ISM transmit power of the WiFi/BT transceiver isreduced. For example, based on the LTE received signal quality, aninternal controller may send an instruction to the WiFi/BT transceiverto adjust the transmit power level.

FIG. 11 illustrates a second example of a power control solution for3GPP coexistence interference avoidance. Similar to FIG. 10, when LTE TXsignal 111 happens at a frequency channel close to WiFi/BT RX signal112, the transmit power of the LTE transceiver can be reduced. In LTEsystems, however, the legacy LTE power control mechanism cannot bebroken for coexistence. Therefore, instead of reducing the LTE TX powerdirectly, a more acceptable solution is to adjust the power headroommargin. For example, based on the WiFi/BT/GNSS received signal quality,an internal controller evaluates a new maximum transmit powerrestriction level. The new maximum transmit power restriction level isthen recommended by the LTE transceiver to its eNB.

Because device coordination capability is required to support varioussolutions for coexistence interference avoidance, it is thus proposedthat a central control entity to be implemented in a wireless device tocoordinate co-located radio transceivers. Referring back to FIG. 4 orFIG. 5, a central control entity (e.g., 44 in FIG. 4 or 55 in FIG. 5)communicates with all co-located in-device radio transceivers and makescoexistence interference avoidance decisions. The central control entitydetects which transceivers are connected, and then enables correspondingcoexistence interference coordination. If a specifictransceiver/receiver is not connected with the central control entity,it is assumed as uncoordinated where the central control entity mayinstruct other transceivers to perform passive interference avoidance(e.g., BT to reduce hopping range).

FIG. 12 illustrates a detailed procedure of coexistence interferenceavoidance utilizing an in-device central control entity in a wirelesscommunication system. The wireless communication system comprises a UEcontaining a central control entity and various co-located radiotransceivers including LTE, WiFi, BT transceivers and a GNSS receiver.In order to facilitate various interference avoidance solutions, thecentral control entity first needs to collect information from theco-located transceivers and thereby determining and sending controlinformation to coordinate the co-located transceivers (phase 121). Forexample, the central control entity receives signal/traffic/schedulinginformation from a first transceiver (e.g., LTE, in step 151) and sendscorresponding control information to a second transceiver (e.g.,WiFi/BT/GNSS, in step 152). Similarly, the central control entityreceives signal/traffic/scheduling information from the secondtransceiver (e.g., WiFi/BT/GNSS, in step 153) and sends correspondingcontrol information to the first transceiver (e.g., LTE, in step 154).The transceivers then perform certain actions based on the receivedcontrol information to trigger FDM/TDM/power control solution.

Under FDM solution (phase 122), the central control entity receivesradio signal information and determines control information to triggerFDM solution. The radio signal information related to FDM solution mayinclude the following: transmission status (e.g., ON or OFF, TX mode orRX mode), level of coexistence interference, received signal quality orstrength (e.g. RSRP, RSRQ, CQI level of LTE), serving frequency of LTE,WiFi frequency channel information, BT frequency hopping rangeinformation, and center frequency of GNSS signal. Based on the radiosignal information, the central control entity determines whether themeasured coexistence interference should trigger FDM solution (e.g., instep 161 for LTE and step 162 for WiFi/BT/GNSS). If FDM solution is tobe triggered, then the central control entity sends the followingcontrol information: an instruction to trigger the LTE transceiver toindicate to the LTE eNB on the downlink reception problem due tocoexistence interference, an instruction to trigger the LTE transceiverto send which frequencies may or may not be seriously interfered due tocoexistence (e.g., usable or unusable frequencies) to the LTE eNB, aninstruction to trigger the LTE transceiver to send an indication to theLTE eNB for handover operation (e.g., step 163), an instruction to theWiFi transceiver to switch to a new WiFi channel, a recommendation tothe WiFi transceiver to use a specific WiFi channel, and an instructionto the BT transceiver to adjust the BT frequency hopping range (e.g.,step 164).

In LTE systems, in order to mitigate coexistence interferenceeffectively, the LTE transceiver needs to know when to measurecoexistent interference and when to report the coexistence problem tothe eNB. One important role of the central control entity is to collectinformation on whether the WiFi/BT transceiver is transmitting orreceiving within limited time latency. The control entity will thendetermine the time duration where the LTE receiver can measurecoexistence interference, and the time duration where the LTE receivercan receive without coexistence interference. The triggering conditionfor reporting coexistence problems and for applying FDM solution isconfigured by the network. Furthermore, it should be noted that thefinal decision of FDM solutions such as the serving frequency afterhandover, although triggered based on the control information, is alsomade by the eNB (not the UE) in LTE systems.

Under TDM solution (phase 123), the central control entity receivestraffic and scheduling information and determines control information totrigger TDM solution. The traffic and scheduling information related toTDM solution may include the following: transmission status (e.g., ON orOFF, TX mode or RX mode), level of coexistence interference, receivedsignal quality or strength (e.g. RSRP, RSRQ, CQI level of LTE), priorityTX or RX request (e.g., TX or RX important signal), operation mode(e.g., WiFi AP mode, WiFi STA mode, BT eSCO, BT A2DP, initial satellitesignal acquisition, GNSS tracking mode), WiFi Beacon reception timeinformation, LTE DRX configuration, LTE connection mode (e.g., RRCCONNECTED or RRC IDLE), LTE Duplexing mode (e.g., TDD or FDD), LTEcarrier aggregation (CA) configuration, BT master or slave, trafficpattern information (e.g., BT periodicity, required TX/RX slot number)and GNSS receiver type (e.g., GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou ordural-receiver).

Based on the traffic and scheduling information, the central controlentity sends the instruction to local control entity in LTE transceiverto trigger TDM along with part of the following control information:ON/OFF duration or ratio or duty cycle information for the LTEtransceiver to recommend the DRX configuration to the LTE eNB (e.g.,step 171), a starting time suitable to trigger LTE interferenceavoidance, a time duration the LTE transceiver should terminate signaltransmission (e.g., step 172), an instruction to terminate LTE ULtransmission within certain time latency, an instruction to terminateWiFi/BT transmission over specific time duration (e.g., step 173), aninformation of specific time duration when WiFi/BT/GNSS can receivesignal without LTE coexistence interference, an instruction to terminateWiFi/BT transmission within certain time latency, an instruction toresume WiFi/BT transmission, and instruction to negotiate with remoteWiFi AP on data transmission and/or reception time by power savingprotocol (e.g., step 174), an instruction to switch BT coexistence TX/RXON/OFF pattern, and information of specific time duration that GNSSsignal reception may suffer coexistence interference from LTE.

Under power control solution (phase 124), the central control entityreceives radio signal and power information and determines controlinformation to trigger power control solution. The radio signal andpower information for power control solution mainly includes thereceived signal quality measured by the LTE/WiFi/BT/GNSS, thetransmission power information of WiFi/BT, and the current maximumtransmit power level of LTE. For LTE power control, the central controlentity may base on the received signal quality of WiFi/BT/GNSS toestimate how much interference could further suffer. The central controlentity may further base on the current maximum LTE transmit power levelto estimate the maximum LTE transmit power level that can be afforded bythe WiFi/BT/GNSS to achieve minimum received signal quality (step 181).On the other hand, for WiFi/BT power control, the central control entitymay simply instruct the WiFi/BT transceiver to adjust transmit powerlevel if the received signal quality for LTE signal is poor (step 182).

It is noted that the listed information for FDM, TDM, and power controlsolutions are exemplary and not mutually exclusive. Instead, additionalinformation may be applied in any of the solutions, and the sameinformation may be applied in multiple solutions. For example, operationtype information or traffic pattern information, although are mainlyused for TDM solution, may also be used for FDM solution in determiningwhether to trigger a possible handover procedure. Furthermore, differentsolutions may be applied together to better mitigate coexistenceinterference.

It is further noted that, although the objective of theabove-illustrated solutions is to prevent and reduce coexistenceinterference, coexistence interference may not always be prevented orreduced after applying the various FDM/TDM/power control solutions. Forexample, in some geographic area, the LTE network is only deployed on apoor frequency and an LTE device will always be handover to thefrequency with worse coexistence interference once it moves into thatgeographic area.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart of a method of coexistence interferenceavoidance using FDM solution. A wireless device comprises multiple radiotransceivers and a central control entity. The central control entityreceives a first radio signal information from a first control entitybelongs to a first LTE transceiver (step 131). The central controlentity also receives a second radio signal information from a secondcontrol entity belongs to a second radio transceiver co-located with thefirst LTE transceiver (step 132). Based on the first and the secondradio signal information, the central control entity determines controlinformation, and transmits the control information to the first and thesecond control entities (step 133). At least in part based on thecontrol information, the first and the second transceivers operate indesignated frequency channels and thereby mitigate coexistenceinterference.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart of a method of coexistence interferenceavoidance using TDM solution. A wireless device comprises multiple radiotransceivers and a central control entity. The central control entityreceives a first traffic and scheduling information from a first controlentity belongs to a first LTE transceiver (step 131). The centralcontrol entity also receives a second traffic and scheduling informationfrom a second control entity belongs to a second radio transceiverco-located with the first LTE transceiver (step 132). Based on the firstand the second traffic and scheduling information, the central controlentity determines control information, and transmits the controlinformation to the first and the second control entities (step 133). Atleast in part based on the control information, the first and the secondtransceivers are scheduled for transmitting and receiving radio signalsin specific time duration and thereby mitigate coexistence interference.

Although the present invention has been described in connection withcertain specific embodiments for instructional purposes, the presentinvention is not limited thereto. For example, although an LTE-advancedmobile communication system is exemplified to describe the presentinvention, the present invention can be similarly applied to othermobile communication systems, such as Time Division Synchronous CodeDivision Multiple Access (TD-SCDMA) systems. Accordingly, variousmodifications, adaptations, and combinations of various features of thedescribed embodiments can be practiced without departing from the scopeof the invention as set forth in the claims.

1. A method comprising: receiving a first radio signal information froma first control entity, wherein the first control entity belongs to afirst LTE radio transceiver; receiving a second radio signal informationfrom a second control entity, wherein the second control entity belongsto a second transceiver co-located with the first LTE radio transceiver;and determining, based on the first and the second radio signalinformation, control information to be sent to the first and the secondcontrol entity, wherein the first and the second radio transceiversoperate in designated frequency channels based at least in part on thecontrol information and thereby mitigating co-existence interference. 2.The method of claim 1, wherein the control information containsinstruction to trigger the first LTE radio transceiver to indicate to anLTE base station on downlink reception problem due to coexistenceinterference.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the control informationcontains instruction to trigger the first LTE radio transceiver toindicate to an LTE base station which frequency channels suffersignificant coexistence interference.
 4. The method of claim 1, whereinthe control information contains instruction to trigger the first LTEradio transceiver to send indication to an LTE base station for handoverfrom a first RF carrier to a second RF carrier.
 5. The method of claim1, wherein the second transceiver is a WiFi transceiver, and wherein thecontrol information contains instruction or recommendation of a new WiFifrequency channel for the second WiFi transceiver.
 6. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the second transceiver is a Bluetooth (BT) transceiver,and wherein the control information contains instruction to adjustfrequency-hopping range for the second BT transceiver.
 7. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the first and the second radio signal informationcomprises at least one of coexistence interference measurementinformation, transmission time information, received signal qualityinformation, transmission status information, LTE serving frequencyinformation, WiFi frequency channel information, BT frequency-hoppingrange information, and center frequency information of GNSS signal. 8.The method of claim 1, wherein the control information comprises amaximum power restriction level for the first LTE radio transceiver. 9.A wireless communication device, comprising: a first control entitybelongs to a first LTE radio transceiver; a co-located second controlentity belongs to a co-located second radio transceiver; and a centralcontrol entity that receives radio signal information from the first andthe second control entities, wherein the central control entitydetermines control information to be sent to the first and the secondcontrol entities, and wherein the first and the second radiotransceivers operate in designated frequency channels based at least inpart on the control information and thereby mitigating co-existenceinterference.
 10. The wireless communication device of claim 9, whereinthe control information contains instruction to trigger the first LTEradio transceiver to indicate to an LTE base station on downlinkreception problem due to coexistence interference.
 11. The wirelesscommunication device of claim 9, wherein the control informationcontains instruction to trigger the first LTE radio transceiver toindicate to an LTE base station which frequency channels suffersignificant coexistence interference.
 12. The wireless communicationdevice of claim 9, wherein the control information contains instructionto trigger the first LTE radio transceiver to send indication to an LTEbased station for handover from a first RF carrier to a second RFcarrier.
 13. The wireless communication device of claim 9, wherein thesecond radio transceiver is a WiFi transceiver, and wherein the controlinformation contains instruction or recommendation of a new WiFifrequency channel for the second WiFi transceiver.
 14. The wirelesscommunication device of claim 9, wherein the second radio transceiver isa Bluetooth (BT) transceiver, and wherein the control informationcontains instruction to adjust frequency-hopping range for the second BTtransceiver.
 15. The wireless communication device of claim 9, whereinthe first and the second radio signal information comprises at least oneof coexistence interference measurement information, transmission timeinformation, received signal quality information, transmission statusinformation, LTE serving frequency information, WiFi frequency channelinformation, BT frequency-hopping range information, and centerfrequency information of GNSS signal.
 16. The wireless communicationdevice of claim 9, wherein the control information comprises a maximumpower restriction level for the first LTE radio transceiver. 17-34.(canceled)